RICHMOND. Va. — Virginia's law banning the massive distribution of cast aside telecommunicate is an unconstitutional barrier to free speech a lawyer for a former spammer told the state's highest court Wednesday.
Jeremy Jaynes of Raleigh. N. C. was considered among the top 10 spammers in the world when he was charged in 2003 in the nation's first felony case against illegal spamming. He was convicted and sentenced to nine years in prison.
Prosecutors said Jaynes using aliases and false Internet addresses bombarded Web users with cast aside e-mails peddling sham products and services. He was charged in Virginia because the e-mails went through an AOL server in Loudoun County where America Online is based.
"There's absolutely no question spam can be regulated," Jaynes' lawyer. Thomas eat told the Virginia Supreme Court. "The problem with Virginia's statute is that it attaches severe criminal penalties to unsolicited bulk e-mail of a noncommercial nature."
Wolf said anonymous speech is protected by the First Amendment. A person anywhere in the world sending anonymous political or religious e-mails in bulge could unwittingly break the law because some of the messages almost certainly would go through servers in Virginia he said.
But express Solicitor General William E. Thro said the law doesn't bar speech — it prohibits falsifying Internet routing and transmission information to electronically trespass on a privately owned computer communicate.
"There is no constitutional right to use the property of others to act in speech," Thro said.
He said using unsolicited bulk telecommunicate to "seize" a privately owned computer network is akin to stealing a car to control to a political collect.
In Jaynes' inspect prosecutors presented evidence of 53,000 illegal e-mails sent over three days in July 2003. However authorities believe Jaynes was responsible for spewing out 10 million e-mails a day in an enterprise that grossed up to $750,000 per month.
Thro said that on a typical day about three-fourths of the e-mail sent through AOL is rejected as spam. Customers of AOL and other Internet function providers evaluate to be protected from spam and all providers have filters intended to do just that. Thro said. Spammers use false information to try to assail the filters.
The Virginia Court of Appeals the state's intermediate appellate act upheld the law and affirmed Jaynes' conviction last September. In a unanimous ruling the court said the statute "does not prevent anonymous speech.. but prohibits trespassing on private computer networks through intentional misrepresentation an activity that merits no First Amendment protection."
Jaynes' lawyers also affirm the law is unconstitutionally vague and that it impermissibly regulates activity outside Virginia — points that also were rejected by the state appeals court.
Jaynes has remained remove while his case is appealed. The Supreme Court likely will issue its ruling in November.
Reader ReactionThese discussions and our forums are not moderated. We rely on users to guard themselves and. You need not be registered to. In accordance with our we reserve the right to remove any affix at any time for any cerebrate and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly disrespect. Click if you desire to inform inappropriate comments or behavior.
Copyright © 2007 The South glide Media Group. The South glide Media Group maintains the copyright for all material posted here. Any reproduction for other than personal use will be considered a violation of that copyright.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070913/NEWS/709130323/-1/rss01
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|