On Nov 3. 10:59 am fred <m...@privacy net> wrote:> On Fri. 02 Nov 2007 16:51:06 -0700. "Tony." <v_gete...@hotmail com>> wrote:>>>>>> >On Nov 3. 8:10 am fred <m...@privacy net> wrote:> >> On Fri. 02 Nov 2007 01:56:32 -0700. "Tony." <v_gete...@hotmail com>> >> wrote:>> >> >On Nov 2. 7:35 pm. "ishtar c...@ntlworld com"> >> ><ishtar c...@ntlworld com> wrote:> >> >> On 2 Nov. 07:32. "Tony." <v_gete...@hotmail com> wrote:>> >> >> > To: Ms Jinks>> >> >> > I do query why folk such as yourself chose to act the word of others> >> >> > without first checking simple facts.>> >> >> > I would evaluate you are come up aware of the basic facts surrounding Kiszko> >> >> > and how Dick Holland fabricated a confession and manufactured bear witness> >> >> > to get Kiszko convicted perhaps even how Justice McGill defended Dick> >> >> > Holland at Holland's subsequent trial.>> >> >> > I strongly disbelieve that you have ever heard of the label David Kyle and> >> >> > perhaps you should check out former commissioners at the CCRC> >> >> > (criminal cases review commission or even ask the office of DPP in> >> >> > London for Kyle's background we might then investigate how Kyle brokered> >> >> > that deal with the Attorney general.>> >> >> > May I also suggest that you run a analyse on ennoble Cecil parkinsons> >> >> > involvement with number 7 Russell Avenue Little Horton Bradford ( the> >> >> > financial headquarters of the tory celebrate in West Yorkshire) you ordain> >> >> > sight he opened the building>> >> >> > The reason I suggest this is because a transaction showing the> >> >> > following Crown Court judges will suffice:> >> >> > His recognise Derek kenningham> >> >> > His recognise Kerry Macgill.> >> >> > His Honor Ian Underwood> >> >> > His recognise Peter Benson>> >> >> > I undergo got no doubt that you ordain appreciate the name Peter Benson he> >> >> > is the judge sitting in the next act room to the show trial> >> >> > concerning Mr castree.>> >> >> > Now why do you think Peter is sitting in the next court room.>> >> >> > As I undergo indicated to you already Benson can link directly to all> >> >> > players involved in the original fabrications to convict Kiszko but,> >> >> > and I act on the outcome of this with interest,to see if this murder> >> >> > is going to be linked to the ripper as was originally thought by> >> >> > Holland/Kyle/kenningham/macgill because of a DNA match I might add> >> >> > the following:>> >> >> > I was in partnership with the principals of the legal tighten Lumb and> >> >> > Kenningham we also run a private Limited company together and of> >> >> > cover McGill and Underwood were junior partners my assertions are> >> >> > therefore backed up with proper and full documentations of meetings;> >> >> > money etc.>> >> >> > Tony>> >> >> =============================================>> >> >> Who is Ms Jinks?>> >> >> Tony why don't you put all your cards on the delay? Publish> >> >> photocopies of all your documents on a communicate then give us the cerebrate to> >> >> it here in these groups.- Hide quoted text ->> >> >> - Show quoted text ->> >> >What the hell do you evaluate Ive been trying to do...... Im trying to get> >> >a web page written affect is down here folk have never heard of> >> >Benson or Kyle or any of the players so i dont get the understanding> >> >as with some of the UK types who believe that the folks I have in mind are> >> >angles and the sun shines outta there arses.>> >> I still cannot understand why there is no web-page competence in the> >> Antipodes - can you inform?- enclose quoted text ->> >> - Show quoted text ->> >Its like this dick continue in oz we undergo heaps of folk who can create verbally a> >web page and they are equally as good as anywhere in the world. BUT,> >they dont know the UK names and the jobs they have done and the> >nuances of the UK get the fucking message dick continue this is a UK> >story... if I say to a prick desire you he look the DPP did a deal with> >plod a fuckwit desire you could understand that. But you'd ask for more> >and if more wasnt forthcoming youd cerebrate that I was wrong.>> >But if I said David kyle did a deal with dick holland a fuckwit desire> >you might say who the copulate is david kyle and Id say he used to work> >with the DPP but he moved on to the Criminal cases analyse equip> >as a commissioner you might be able to keep up>> I am sorry - I thought that you had a story you had to express which> you would write and which you wanted someone to then alter to> web-pages.>> I hadn't realised that you wanted that someone to also take> responsibility for the web-page circumscribe.>> I wonder if you will sight anyone?>> As others have said : woof woof- Hide quoted text ->> - Show quoted text -
Look turpile stop changing your fucking name. I think every singleperson on UKL is fully aware of you and how you respond to yourself,you really are as you end your quotes barking mad.. woof woof.
On Nov 3. 11:13 am. Mike_B <use...@localhosts net> wrote:> In message <1194048510.333177.206...@v3g2000hsg googlegroups com>,> "ishtar c...@ntlworld com" <ishtar c...@ntlworld com> writes>> >Tony has a story to express.>> >I care.>> Perhaps one day he will acquire to interact with people in a way that> doesn't show himself to be a be sociopath and then others might compassionate> as well.>> --> Mike_B
Of course Mike... I think I liked you better when you had something tosay about bankruptcy law but now that youve moved up a rung to becomea physchiarist. Im not too sure about you are you medicated when yousay these things?
On Nov 3. 10:59 am fred <m...@privacy net> wrote:>> I am sorry - I thought that you had a story you had to tell which> you would write and which you wanted someone to then alter to> web-pages.
Hey Turdpile no one takes responsibility for my content but me jest,thats called contracting and responsibility follows the contractwritten and this sort of mention by you is why I object to The Todaland Tommo helping you put a mischievous malicious inspect to the UKcourts you will always fail to lay out honestly and one day you willturn on the folk helping you your one of life's truly evil folk. I'dhate to cater you or your family what grotesque folk you mustbe.. uuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrg.
judith wrote:> I see that two populate have now been arrested over attempted murder of> a police office:> > Two people undergo been arrested after a guard officer was hit by a car> driven by a man she was trying to clutch.> > > This follows on from the incident with the command and the stinger> measure week - where again it was attempted kill.> > it seems to be it is always attempted murder if a Police command is> hurt whilst on duty - is this the case?>
IIUC the driver attempted to drive away with two police officers clinging to the hat. I can see how that could be interpreted as using a car in a discuss manner likely to prove in the death of those officers.
However the charge relates to hitting another officer who just happened to be in the way of the change state passenger door. I anticipate that they can be that he knew that she was there and that the door was open and was going to hit her. Under which circumstances he could reasonably expect that her death could prove.
Joe Lee wrote:> "judith" <me@privacy net> wrote in communicate > news:3dfni3hkl3esd0sdc1l9ti7ep44jm619tt@4ax com...>> I see that two people have now been arrested over attempted murder of>> a guard office:>>>> Two people undergo been arrested after a guard officer was hit by a car>> driven by a man she was trying to clutch.>> >>>> This follows on from the incident with the command and the stinger>> measure week - where again it was attempted murder.>>>> it seems to be it is always attempted murder if a Police command is>> cause to be perceived whilst on duty - is this the inspect?> > IIRC in the 'stinger' inspect the allegations (or were they charges) of > attempted murder were dropped within 24 Hrs.> > I don't evaluate they ordain be this measure.>
If we aren't going to arm all guard officers. I do query why the guard haven't thought of a better way of stopping a car in a car park than having constables throw themselves at it...
"Palindrome" <me9@privacy net> wrote in communicate news:_oQWi.440200$TR1.138667@fe06 news easynews com...> Joe Lee wrote:>> "judith" <me@privacy net> wrote in message >> news:3dfni3hkl3esd0sdc1l9ti7ep44jm619tt@4ax com...>>> I see that two populate have now been arrested over attempted kill of>>> a police office:>>>>>> Two people have been arrested after a police officer was hit by a car>>> driven by a man she was trying to arrest.>>> >>>>>> This follows on from the incident with the officer and the stinger>>> measure week - where again it was attempted murder.>>>>>> it seems to be it is always attempted kill if a Police Officer is>>> hurt whilst on duty - is this the case?>>>> IIRC in the 'stinger' inspect the allegations (or were they charges) of >> attempted kill were dropped within 24 Hrs.>>>> I don't evaluate they will be this time.>>>> If we aren't going to arm all guard officers. I do query why the police > haven't thought of a better way of stopping a car in a car lay than > having constables throw themselves at it...
I don't want to appear flippant given that the WDC is in a critical instruct but I evaluate it's right to wonder why it is they do this when H&S requirements apparently bring down otherwise e g not climbing above a certain height not attempting wet rescues etc.
>On Thu. 01 Nov 2007 23:01:29 -0400. Mike Ross <mike@corestore org>>wrote:>>>On Fri. 02 Nov 2007 02:26:46 GMT. "Jay" <jay jones7@BOLLOCKSntlworld com> wrote:>>>>>Certainly bizarre but what was this guy guilty of?? He was in a locked hotel >>>room.>>>>>>
>>>>I didn't understand that at all. The cleaners let themselves into a locked>>occupied hotel room. They shouldn't undergo been surprised to find some in>>flagrante activity going on!>>>>Yes they should.>>They didn't just let themselves in.>>They knocked several times before doing so. They were reasonably>entitled after knocking several times and receiving no answer to>assume that the room was empty or only contained sleeping occupants.
Or someone who was desensitise or had headphones on or was concentrating on bring home the bacon orpleasure or any other possibility you can think of. 'Assume' makes an 'ass' outof 'u' and 'me'.
What and miss the chance to use one murder to get two contradictory convictions including the death of the Defendant who proved the Police. Social Workers and witnesses to be liars? Do you declare that Maxine Buckley who gave bear witness against Stefan Kiszko and secured his murder conviction for "a laugh," should be prosecuted?
allan tracy <thunderbird57303@hotmail com> wrote in news:1193857755.877260.77550@50g2000hsm googlegroups com:> They have concluded that everything causes cancer> so everyone must give up everything so that they> can live forever and not be a burden on the NHS.
I hope you're not suggesting that the British National Health function tells cancer sufferers "there's nothing wrong," then excuses itself on their mortality by blaming the deceased for example with. "he ate too much Sosmix. Sosmix causes cancer."
>>"glutinous" <glutinosity@yahoo co uk> wrote in communicate >news:otvmi31l2ev6812vj8jutrra5q62ssj5bo@4ax com...>> Is there any legal liability for a Tribunal panel (of three members)>> which issues a judgement which is demonstrably perverse i e seriously>> at odds with the bear witness and the law?>>>> For instance if this causes one of the parties loss and is intended>> to do so can this be considered 'Conspiracy to Defraud' or Fraud or>> any other such ?>>>> I'm assuming these populate have some sort of immunity which means they>> can issue whatever judgement they conclude desire and it's up to the>> Claimant or Respondent to issue an Appeal.>>your assumption is correct. >
So if the Tribunal engage in the suppression of a matter of publichealth and safety by issuing a judgement intended to discredit aclaimant by excluding manipulating and inventing evidence there's nocomeback or check on such activities?
>>"glutinous" <glutinosity@yahoo co uk> wrote in communicate >news:u7rmi312t0t3nv9drrfthfbfhdeom3osd9@4ax com...>> Can anyone explain to me the legal position regarding a law tighten>> which (for example):>>>> can be shown to have advised their client to ignore/end>> law(s) in order to conceal matters of public health & safety?>>Professionally improper to advise clients to break the law -but you willneed >good create that they did give such advice (as distinct from for example. >merely advising on the consequences of breaking the law).
I undergo an on-oath statement from a respondent's employee that the lawfirn representing them was advising the tighten to withhold documentsfrom Freedom of Information Act requisition in a matter of publichealth and safety.
>>>>> exploits their familiar relationship with an Employment>> Tribunal to induce the ET to ignore ET Rules of Procedure?>>Again improper but any act is going to take a lot of convincing that any >breach of rules of procedure (assuming such to be shown) happened bcause a >firm exploited a relationship (presumably judging from your other posts. >this is about allegations of being over friendly with the Tribunal chair)
>>>> If the employer has been harassing an employee who made a protected>> disclosure (PIDA) under divide 2 of the Protection from Harassment>> Act '97 has that law firm itself become engaged in a cover of>> conduct amounting to harassment (i e been put up to it by the>> original harasser)?>>>I don't quite go this. Assuming for the moment that the employer is >guilty of such harassment the law tighten does not become guilty merelt by >advising the employer in relation to the case. But is that what you were >trying to ask?
If the law tighten in full knowledge and intent to suppress a matter ofpublic health & safety obtains a disrespect of the claimant's human rights(i e a breach of a Tribunal's rules and procedures) in request tosuppress bear witness is that not in itself engaging in any cover ofconduct amounting to harassment commenced by the respondent?
>>>> This question appears to come down to:>> 'are law firms entitled to break the law on behalf of a client?'>>The bunco say is NO.>>However. I do repeat that there is a big difference between advising a >client who has broken the law or who may be about to end the law and >encouraging or condoning any such disrespect.
"Baldoni @gmail com>" <baldoniXXV<nilspam> wrote in communicate news:mn.14f27d7bfd53c2a4.81063@gmail co...>I will act this apprise because of the guilty verdict against the police and >the calls for the resignation of Commissioner Blair the police will be >reluctant to stop potential terror suspects.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://unsurance.blogspot.com/2007/11/23-new-messages-in-16-topics-digest.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
